Book Chapter

PERELMAN Chaim (1912-1984)

Original title (French): PERELMAN Chaïm (1912-1984)

Encyclopedia for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 2020

Written in French — title, summary and keywords translated

Keywords

  • New Rhetoric
  • Chaim Perelman
  • Argumentation
  • Judicial reasoning
  • Universal audience
  • Concrete justice
  • General principles of law
  • Brussels School
  • Statutory interpretation
  • Reasonableness

This page is a translation. Read this work in its original language (French) →

Abstract

Benoit Frydman presents an encyclopedic overview of Chaim Perelman's major contributions to legal philosophy and the theory of justice, tracing how Perelman moved beyond the constraints of formal logic to establish argumentation as the foundation for understanding justice and judicial reasoning. Benoit Frydman emphasizes that Perelman identified six competing conceptions of justice (egalitarian, merit-based, need-based, performance-based, rank-based, and formally legal) that express irreducible values and cannot be reconciled through logic alone; instead, they must be weighed argumentatively depending on concrete circumstances. The article's central argument is that judicial decisions constitute paradigmatic acts of practical reasoning in which judges justify their choices before a 'universal audience,' thereby integrating principles of justice into the ongoing development of positive law and transcending the false divide between natural law and positive law.

Read the summary in the original language (French)

Benoit Frydman presents an encyclopedic overview of Chaïm Perelman's major contributions to legal philosophy and the theory of justice, tracing how Perelman moved beyond the constraints of formal logic to establish argumentation as the foundation for understanding justice and judicial reasoning. Benoit Frydman emphasizes that Perelman identified six competing conceptions of justice (egalitarian, merit-based, need-based, performance-based, rank-based, and formally legal) that express irreducible values and cannot be reconciled through logic alone; instead, they must be weighed argumentatively depending on concrete circumstances. The article's central argument is that judicial decisions constitute paradigmatic acts of practical reasoning in which judges justify their choices before an "universal audience," thereby integrating principles of justice into the ongoing development of positive law and transcending the false divide between natural law and positive law.

Themes

  • Argumentation & Interpretation
  • Justice, Trials & Courts
  • Philosophy & Theory of Law

Full text

This work's full text is available in French →

Cite this work

V° Perelman Chaïm, in Encyclopedia for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, texte accepté pour publication.
@incollection{frydman_2020_perelman_chaim_1912_1984,
  author = {Frydman, Benoit},
  title = {PERELMAN Chaïm (1912-1984)},
  booktitle = {Encyclopedia for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy},
  year = {2020},
  doi = {10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_786-1}
}
TY  - CHAP
AU  - Frydman, Benoit
TI  - PERELMAN Chaïm (1912-1984)
BT  - Encyclopedia for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
PY  - 2020
DO  - 10.1007/978-94-007-6730-0_786-1
ER  -

Click a format to copy it to your clipboard.

Share this work

https://benoitfrydman.com/en/book-chapter/2020-perelman-chaim-1912-1984/