Book Chapter

The new relations between law and economics: three competing hypotheses

Original title (French): Les nouveaux rapports entre droit et économie : trois hypothèses concurrentes

Le droit dans l'action économique, 2000

Written in French — title, summary and keywords translated

Keywords

  • Economic analysis of law
  • Economic natural law
  • Autopoietic systems
  • Niklas Luhmann
  • Jürgen Habermas
  • Communicative rationality
  • Globalization
  • Legal regulation
  • Market economy
  • Structural coupling

This page is a translation. Read this work in its original language (French) →

Abstract

Benoit Frydman synthesizes three theoretically distinct yet complementary approaches to understanding law-economy relations: economic analysis of law (which risks reducing law to instrumental optimization for market efficiency and represents a modern natural law theory), Luhmann's autopoietic systems theory (which insists on functional autonomy and contingent coupling mechanisms), and Habermas's communicative rationality (which highlights law's ambivalent mediation between economic system and civil society). All three models converge on a central problem: the translation of values, data, and objectives across system boundaries necessarily involves distortion and loss, requiring neither economic reductionism nor absolute legal autonomy but rather nuanced understanding of complex systemic interactions.

Read the summary in the original language (French)

Benoît Frydman synthesizes three theoretically distinct yet complementary approaches to understanding law-economy relations: economic analysis of law (which risks reducing law to instrumental optimization for market efficiency and represents a modern natural law theory), Luhmann's autopoietic systems theory (which insists on functional autonomy and contingent coupling mechanisms), and Habermas's communicative rationality (which highlights law's ambivalent mediation between economic system and civil society). All three models converge on a central problem: the translation of values, data, and objectives across system boundaries necessarily involves distortion and loss, requiring neither economic reductionism nor absolute legal autonomy but rather nuanced understanding of complex systemic interactions.

Themes

  • Philosophy & Theory of Law
  • Global & European Law

Full text

This work's full text is available in French →

Cite this work

« Les nouveaux rapports entre droit et économie : trois hypothèses concurrentes » in Le droit dans l'action économique, dir. Th. Kirat et E. Serverin, Paris, Ed. du C.N.R.S., 2000, pp. 25-41.
@incollection{frydman_2000_nouveaux_rapports_entre_droit,
  author = {Frydman, Benoit},
  title = {Les nouveaux rapports entre droit et économie : trois hypothèses concurrentes},
  booktitle = {Le droit dans l'action économique},
  publisher = {Ed. du C.N.R.S.},
  year = {2000},
  pages = {25--41}
}
TY  - CHAP
AU  - Frydman, Benoit
TI  - Les nouveaux rapports entre droit et économie : trois hypothèses concurrentes
BT  - Le droit dans l'action économique
PB  - Ed. du C.N.R.S.
PY  - 2000
SP  - 25
EP  - 41
ER  -

Click a format to copy it to your clipboard.

Share this work

https://benoitfrydman.com/en/book-chapter/2000-the-new-relations-between-law-and-economics-three-competing/